Thursday, July 19, 2012

Review of THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (Part 1)


Review of The Amazing Spider-Man

I’m going to start this review like I do all my reviews—I’m going to start with the preproduction and move into generalities of the film, commenting on things that will not ruin any of the major plot points of the film if you have not yet seen it. Then I’ll follow that up with an in-depth analysis of everything which will include spoilers and can be read after you see the movie.

Acting: 7/10

Story: 7/10

Effects: 8.5/10

Overall: 7.75/10
 
When I first heard that Sony had dropped negotiations with Sam Raimi to direct a fourth Spider-Man movie I was a bit skeptical. I mean, Spider-Man 3 was not nearly as good as Spider-Man 2, but I didn’t hate it. I kind of enjoyed parts of it—even though it suffered from Joel Schumacher syndrome in that it had two too many villains. But the studio’s decision to go with someone else wasn’t a shocker after the critical failure of the last one (and let’s be honest, lots of people jumped on the hate bandwagon because the popular opinion was negative; why else would it have made the money it did if it was so bad?). Then Sony announced that not only would they be switching directors, but that they would be rebooting the entire franchise from the ground up, essentially erasing all of the mythology created over the last ten years. New actors, new mythology, new suit, new everything. So, yeah, I was a bit grumpy after all I had invested in my fandom. But I kept an open mind because, after all, it was the only way I was going to get to see Spider-Man on the big screen again.

When they revealed Andrew Garfield had been cast as Peter Parker I was. . . indecisive. Another citizen of the United Kingdom had been given the part of one of America’s greatest heroes. We already had Christian Bale as Batman and the recent news that Henry Cavill was cast as the new Superman. All of them Brits. My other hesitation was that Garfield was kind of a good looking guy, and Peter Parker is supposed to be anything but. Not that he is supposed to be a hideous monster of a human, but he’s supposed to blend in, which is something Toby Maguire did very well. He wasn’t hunky or hot, just there. I thought that Garfield was a decent enough choice, but I wondered if there wasn’t someone better suited.

And speaking of being “suited.” A few weeks after filming began, the first official photo of Andrew in the new Spidey suit hit the net. It was a morose picture of a battered and dirty, maskless Peter Parker, his suit with huge claw marks on it. At this point is where the second major rift happened in the fandom world. Much like the outright hatred of the new U.S.S. Enterprise from J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek, people started swearing not to see the movie based on a single still image. I was . . . again, indecisive. Yes, the suit looked like it was made of pieces of basketballs sewn together and painted red and blue. It didn’t have that silky sheen of spandex—nor did it look like Peter had crafted this outfit on his own (a major flaw that the first series suffered from). But that wasn’t the huge news. The major reveal was the mechanical web-shooters. Raimi worked hard to force the idea of the organic ones on us, and it started to take hold, so much so that even the comics adapted them for a time. But, again, this news put a huge frowny face on fans who simply refused to see someone else’s vision of the character. Then a few more photos turned up of the full suit revealing the gold-colored eyepieces and I was still not thrilled, but willing to wait until some kind of teaser trailer popped up to see the suit in action. After all, I wasn’t big on the raised webbing on the earlier costumes until I actually saw how it functioned on film.

I was impressed with the teaser released last year. More than that, I was intrigued. There seemed to be a nice mix of character and action as well as a bit more of a nod to the origins of the character. So I waited patiently.

If you’ve made it this far, good for you because now I get to talk about the movie.

The film opens on a little-explored chapter in young Peter’s life: his childhood. We are treated to a mystery right away in the ransacking of Mr. Parker’s home office that Peter discovers during a game of hide-and-seek. Right away the story takes off as the child is whisked away to his aunt and uncle’s house (played by Sally Field and Martin Sheen, respectively). Mr. Parker is vague about details and his final words to his son are “Be good.” Instantly it is present day and Peter is at high school. From here the story drags a bit as we see Peter being bullied by Flash Thompson, as well as allusion to Peter’s fondness for photography.

Also in this first segment are all of the necessary character informational scenes that are needed during an “origin” story of this sort. Peter being a science nerd (something that was kind of left out of the Raimi trilogy); Peter being uncomfortable around girls; Peter being a victim. But there is also a pivotal scene in which a pre-powers Peter shows us his tendency to stand up for the little guy. These scenes are well-acted and do a pretty good job of portraying life in high school—though they all seem to go to Midtown Science High School, so I’m not sure if that is an advanced school or something, but Flash isn’t really the science type, so I’m not sure how that fit in.

That’s when everything changes for Peter and everyone around him. He discovers his father’s old briefcase, one that was entrusted to Ben and May by Peter’s father with a promise to keep it (and Peter) safe. I won’t spoil what’s in the briefcase here, but suffice it to say, its contents lead Peter to seek out Dr. Curt Connors at Oscorp by sneaking into their intern program. There he bumps into Gwen Stacy, who works as an intern to the aforementioned doctor. After more than a little flirting, Peter wanders off and finds himself in a room full of spiders who are spinning on some kind of device to harvest their webbing (under a blacklight for some reason). No need to go into great detail about what happens here—it’s pretty self-explanatory. Boom. Spider powers.

The next chunk of the story is dedicated to Peter exploring his new powers, starting with a somewhat humorous and expertly choreographed scene on a subway train. Here we see Peter starting to come out of his shell and he explores all these cool new things he can do. He is both awed as a teenager and intrigued as a scientist. Also prevalent is the fact that director Marc Webb made it very clear that he was going to do a lot of practical stunts as opposed to relying on the rubbery and cartoonish style of CG. And it works very well here. Watching an animated humanoid bounce around in all of its digital glory is well and good, but it lacks that verisimilitude at someone like Richard Donner put into Superman with the use of cranes and wires to pull Christopher Reeve off the ground.

From here on out the story gets complicated and to discuss it too much would end up with spoilers all over the place, so I’ll hold back on that until a little later. But here’s what I can say: The Amazing Spider-Man is probably the second best portrayal of the webbed wonder since 2004’s Spider-Man 2.

The acting, for the majority, was excellent and could have been excellent even without the Spidey element. This was just an all-around well-acted film. Garfield did a great job as the spastic teen Peter who bridges the gap into over-confidence after he gets his powers. Martin Sheen pulls of a fabulous Uncle Ben that puts that not-acting touch that Cliff Robertson missed. Sally Field as Aunt May was overshadowed by her reduced role (in this film), but her scenes were strong and she brought Aunt May back into the realm of believability—most of the incarnations (on-screen and in the comics have her as just plain old). Rhys Ifans was great as Dr. Connors, but his Lizard was shaky and over-acted. Emma Stone, while fun to look at and dream about, might not have been the right choice to play Gwen. Her strength as a woman (as an actress and a character) really made it hard for me to believe that she needed saving; more that she only needed help cleaning up the mess after she kicked ass—and yet a pivotal scene has her hiding in a closest.

The effects were top-notch! Many a mile has been crossed in the advance of technology in the decade since the first film, and the blending of CG and live-action stunts was relatively smooth in most cases. Unfortunately, everything that was great about the effects was severely crushed by the awkwardness of the CG Lizard. Though he was 8-feet tall, green, and has a tail, his face was far too human. I think the design would have been right up the alley for, say, Killer Croc in a Batman movie. But Lizard only looked partly transformed most of the time. I was hoping for a nice mix between something like a Jurassic Park raptor and Dolph Lundgren.

Well, that does it for Part 1. Part 2 should be along sometime soon. Maybe after I see The Dark Knight Rises.